<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do we really need a #container to center CSS layouts? I think not!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/</link>
	<description>Its a blog, just like a million others.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hermes handbags</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>hermes handbags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>You are right, layouts with 100% wide div’s need a container but majority of the websites out there dont use 100% divs. Layouts like those are very unconventional.

The problem is not that the method is being used, the problem is that the method is being used when in fact it is not needed at all!

A container tag is like wrapping an UnOrdered List in a Div. Just not right.

Thanks for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, layouts with 100% wide div’s need a container but majority of the websites out there dont use 100% divs. Layouts like those are very unconventional.</p>
<p>The problem is not that the method is being used, the problem is that the method is being used when in fact it is not needed at all!</p>
<p>A container tag is like wrapping an UnOrdered List in a Div. Just not right.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 13:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this interessiting post. This is exact this what i&#039;am looking for since months. _: )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this interessiting post. This is exact this what i&#8217;am looking for since months. _: )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indie_preneur</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>indie_preneur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>What about with sticky footers? Is this the only kind of layout that needs the extra div?

So simple, yet so awesome, nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about with sticky footers? Is this the only kind of layout that needs the extra div?</p>
<p>So simple, yet so awesome, nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kumailht</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>kumailht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>@Darep
You are right, layouts with 100% wide div&#039;s need a container but majority of the websites out there dont use 100% divs. Layouts like those are very unconventional.

The problem is not that the method is being used, the problem is that the method is being used when in fact it is not needed at all!

A container tag is like wrapping an UnOrdered List in a Div. Just not right.

Thanks for your comment! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darep<br />
You are right, layouts with 100% wide div&#8217;s need a container but majority of the websites out there dont use 100% divs. Layouts like those are very unconventional.</p>
<p>The problem is not that the method is being used, the problem is that the method is being used when in fact it is not needed at all!</p>
<p>A container tag is like wrapping an UnOrdered List in a Div. Just not right.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment! <img src='http://www.kumailht.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darep</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Darep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>If you want some div inside the body to span the whole page (width: 100%) then you can&#039;t set a fixed width for body.

Of course, you can use e.g. &#039;position:absolute&#039; and a bunch of other CSS properties, but you&#039;re not making it easy for yourself :)

A good example are headers and footers on many pages - like on http://stuffandnonsense.co.uk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want some div inside the body to span the whole page (width: 100%) then you can&#8217;t set a fixed width for body.</p>
<p>Of course, you can use e.g. &#8216;position:absolute&#8217; and a bunch of other CSS properties, but you&#8217;re not making it easy for yourself <img src='http://www.kumailht.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>A good example are headers and footers on many pages &#8211; like on <a href="http://stuffandnonsense.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://stuffandnonsense.co.uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kumailht</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>kumailht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>@Yuriy Voziy
Around 1 in 1000 sites probably need the container. The rest just don&#039;t know about this method I guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yuriy Voziy<br />
Around 1 in 1000 sites probably need the container. The rest just don&#8217;t know about this method I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuriy Voziy</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuriy Voziy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>@Kumailht, ha tricky. But this is not fair panel :) It&#039;s floating to the bottom. 
You will always see it regardless scroll :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kumailht, ha tricky. But this is not fair panel <img src='http://www.kumailht.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s floating to the bottom.<br />
You will always see it regardless scroll <img src='http://www.kumailht.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kumailht</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>kumailht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>@Yuriy Voziy
Your comment almost changed my mind.. until I tried doing it!
Check out the example again, its got a panel too :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yuriy Voziy<br />
Your comment almost changed my mind.. until I tried doing it!<br />
Check out the example again, its got a panel too <img src='http://www.kumailht.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuriy Voziy</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuriy Voziy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>I can understand why this wont be used by CSS frameworks. Because it must be usable in most cases.
When you setup width for  tag you can&#039;t add top full-width panels on the top(or bottom) of the page ( eg. Facebook, Google, LiveJournal). 
And people are trying to use most common patterns for templating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand why this wont be used by CSS frameworks. Because it must be usable in most cases.<br />
When you setup width for  tag you can&#8217;t add top full-width panels on the top(or bottom) of the page ( eg. Facebook, Google, LiveJournal).<br />
And people are trying to use most common patterns for templating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kumailht</title>
		<link>http://www.kumailht.com/blog/css/do-we-really-need-a-container-to-center-css-layouts-i-think-not/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>kumailht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kumailht.com/blog/?p=993#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>@Yuriy Voziy
Do you understand why this method is not used? I still don&#039;t get it, why the extra div?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yuriy Voziy<br />
Do you understand why this method is not used? I still don&#8217;t get it, why the extra div?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

